Crowdsearcher.cloud

fact checking

#OpenData Directory: #INDONESIA #Crowdsearcher

Data are considered to be “open” if anyone can freely access, use, re-use and redistribute them, for any purpose, without restrictions.

 


ASIA – Indonesia: Badan Pusat Statistik (Indonesia)
__§_bps.go.id


ASIA – Indonesia: Open Data Banda Aceh (Banda Aceh City Government) Agencies
__§_data.bandaacehkota.go.id
____Open Data Banda Aceh|Agencies


ASIA – Indonesia: Portal Data Bandung (Bandung City Government) Population and Employment, Economy and Finance, Education, Health, Environment, etc..
__§_data.bandung.go.id
____Portal Data Bandung|Population and Employment, Economy and Finance, Education, Health, Environment, etc..


ASIA – Indonesia: Data Indonesia (Indonesia)
__§_data.id


ASIA – Indonesia: Portal Open Data Gerak (Gerak Aceh) Mineral and Coal, Oil and Gas Forestry / Plantation, Budgets, Health, Education, Case Reports, Public Information, Village Fund
__§_data.gerakaceh.id
____Portal Open Data Gerak|Mineral and Coal, Oil and Gas Forestry / Plantation, Budgets, Health, Education, Case Reports, Public Information, Village Fund


ASIA – Indonesia: Jakarta Open Data (Jakarta Provincial Government) Health, Education, etc..
__§_data.jakarta.go.id
____Jakarta Open Data|Health, Education, etc..


ASIA – Indonesia: Meteorological And Geophysical Agency (Indonesia)
__§_bmkg.go.id


ASIA – Indonesia: Ministry Of Energy And Mines (Indonesia)
__§_esdm.go.id

other open data portals

The key features of openness are:

Availability and access: the data must be available as a whole and at no more than a reasonable reproduction cost, preferably by downloading over the internet. The data must also be available in a convenient and modifiable form.
Reuse and redistribution: the data must be provided under terms that permit reuse and redistribution including the intermixing with other datasets. The data must be machine-readable.
Universal participation: everyone must be able to use, reuse and redistribute — there should be no discrimination against fields of endeavour or against persons or groups. For example, ‘non-commercial’ restrictions that would prevent ‘commercial’ use, or restrictions of use for certain purposes (e.g. only in education), are not allowed.

Open Data initiatives, activities and portals:
http://bit.ly/open-data-map

#OpenData Directory: #SOUTHAFRICA#Crowdsearcher

Data are considered to be “open” if anyone can freely access, use, re-use and redistribute them, for any purpose, without restrictions.

 


AFRICA – South Africa: African Development Bank Group Open Data (South Africa)
__§_southafrica.opendataforafrica.org


AFRICA – South Africa: South African Higher Education Data (Centre for Higher Education Trust) Education
__§_chet.org.za
____South African Higher Education Data|Education


AFRICA – South Africa: City of Cape Town Open Data Portal (City of Cape Town)
__§_web1.capetown.gov.za
____City of Cape Town


AFRICA – South Africa: Council For Geoscience (South Africa)
__§_geoscience.org.za


AFRICA – South Africa: Department Of Basic Education (South Africa)
__§_education.gov.za


AFRICA – South Africa: Departmentof Environmental Affairs (Departmentof Environmental Affairs) Arcgis OpenData Portal
__§_data.dea.opendata.arcgis.com
____Arcgis OpenData Portal


AFRICA – South Africa: Esri South Africa Professional Services (Esri South Africa Professional Services) Arcgis OpenData Portal
__§_data.esriza-ps.opendata.arcgis.com
____Arcgis OpenData Portal


AFRICA – South Africa: OpenUp Open Data Portal (OpenUp (ex-Code4SA)) Business, Education, Fun, Government, Health, Personal, Transport
__§_data.code4sa.org
____OpenUp Open Data Portal|Business, Education, Fun, Government, Health, Personal, Transport


AFRICA – South Africa: South Africa Open Data (South Africa)
__§_opendataportal.cloudapp.net


AFRICA – South Africa: South African Weather Service (South Africa)
__§_weathersa.co.za


AFRICA – South Africa: Statistics South Africa (South Africa)
__§_beta2.statssa.gov.za


AFRICA – South Africa: Univerisity Of Kwazulu-natal – African Centre For Population/health Studies (South Africa)
__§_africacentre.ac.za

other open data portals

The key features of openness are:

Availability and access: the data must be available as a whole and at no more than a reasonable reproduction cost, preferably by downloading over the internet. The data must also be available in a convenient and modifiable form.
Reuse and redistribution: the data must be provided under terms that permit reuse and redistribution including the intermixing with other datasets. The data must be machine-readable.
Universal participation: everyone must be able to use, reuse and redistribute — there should be no discrimination against fields of endeavour or against persons or groups. For example, ‘non-commercial’ restrictions that would prevent ‘commercial’ use, or restrictions of use for certain purposes (e.g. only in education), are not allowed.

Open Data initiatives, activities and portals:
http://bit.ly/open-data-map

OPENEDU: Focus on #OpenScience Madrid july 8th, 2019 #FAIRData #CitizenScience #YERUN @YERUN_EU

“Focus on Open Science” – Madrid july 8th, 2019
organised by: Scientific Knowledge Services in collaboration with UCL Press and LIBER (The European Association of Research Libraries).

“Open Science by Design: Practical Commitments for Implementation by (Young) Universities New Indicators — FAIR Data — Citizen Science”

FOLLOW LIVE STREAMING and TWITTER: #OS19MAD

Ask questions using Sli.do (code F0708)

Programme
https://www.focusopenscience.org/book/19madrid/

The Challenge of Open Science

Science describes the current transition in how research is undertaken, how the outputs are stored and disseminated, how researchers collaborate, how success is measured and how researchers are rewarded for Open approaches. Open Science has the potential to transform the research landscape and it is crucial for all the stakeholders (researchers, librarians, policy makers, etc.) to understand and to be part of the new scientific scenario.


The aim of the Focus on Open Science Workshops

Started in 2015, we aim through these workshops to address the challenges posed by Open Science, using the 8 pillars of Open Science identified by the European Commission and addressed by the Open Science Policy Platform in its general integrated recommendations (See OSPP-REC).

The mission statement for the workshops is: “Promote the concept of, values and best practices in the Open Science to European communities, with particular reference to libraries.”


Why are these Workshops important?

We believe that such Workshops offer a practitioner experience, grounded in the principles of Open Science, and opportunities for networking at the local level. The Workshop format offers both on-the-spot interactions and follow-up opportunities.


Steering Committee

We are driven by our Steering Committee that will help us select the annual topics, the invited speakers and advise on best practices for delivering successful events. The members of our Steering Committee are here.


Open Science by Design in Madrid

The Madrid workshop will put in correlation 3 of the 8 challenges of EU Open Science: New indicators and reward system – FAIR Data – and Citizen Science. We will analyse and discuss these important topics with the aim of getting PCIs (Practical Commitments for Implementations) of Open Science, particularly for Universities and Research Performing Organisations. The workshop will include the participation of Early Career Researchers.



How are the Universities going to implement new career assessment methods for Open Science? What are the needed infrastructures and skills for FAIR data? How are we going to include citizens in the scientific landscape for public engagement? Are the data produced by citizen science FAIR? How are going to be rewarded FAIR data practices?

The language of the Workshop will be English.

OPENEDU: #GLOBALfact6 BRINGING THE FACT-CHECKERS OF THE WORLD TOGETHER #19JUNE ~ #21JUNE 2019

OPENEDU: #3MAY 2019 #worldpressfreedomday


Every year, 3 May is a date which celebrates the fundamental principles of press freedom, to evaluate press freedom around the world, to defend the media from attacks on their independence and to pay tribute to journalists who have lost their lives in the exercise of their profession. World Press Freedom Day was proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in 1993 following a Recommendation adopted at the twenty-sixth session of UNESCO’s General Conference in 1991. This in turn was a response to a call by African journalists who in 1991 produced the landmark Windhoek Declaration (link is external) on media pluralism and independence.

At the core of UNESCO’s mandate is freedom of the press and freedom of expression. UNESCO believes that these freedoms allow for mutual understanding to build a sustainable peace.

It serves as an occasion to inform citizens of violations of press freedom – a reminder that in dozens of countries around the world, publications are censored, fined, suspended and closed down, while journalists, editors and publishers are harassed, attacked, detained and even murdered.

It is a date to encourage and develop initiatives in favour of press freedom, and to assess the state of press freedom worldwide.

3 May acts as a reminder to governments of the need to respect their commitment to press freedom and is also a day of reflection among media professionals about issues of press freedom and professional ethics. Just as importantly, World Press Freedom Day is a day of support for media which are targets for the restraint, or abolition, of press freedom. It is also a day of remembrance for those journalists who lost their lives in the pursuit of a story.


OPENEDU: #TheWebConf 2019 #MisinfoWorkshop2019 International Workshop on Misinformation, Computational Fact-Checking and Credible Web @TheWebConf #14May @SanFrancisco

May 14, 2019, San Francisco, CA, USACo-located with The Web Conference 2019

 International Workshop on Misinformation, Computational Fact-Checking and Credible Web

Our society is struggling with an unprecedented amount of falsehood which harms wealth, democracy, and health.

Debunking misinformation and disinformation calls for interdisciplinary collaboration of and advancements in multiple areas, including journalism, communication studies, law and public policy, psychology, and political science. Computing technology plays a crucial role in it. The last few years have witnessed a substantial growth in efforts at computational fact-checking, of which many are data-driven, AI-powered, and include human in the loop. These efforts tackle various fronts, such as the detection of fabricated news, rumors, and spam on social media, automation in fact-checking, flagging clickbait articles, and discovering fake accounts and malicious social media bots.

Advancements in algorithms and AI have raised significant ethics concerns regarding fairness, transparency, trust, and misuse. The concerns are particularly pertinent to fact-checking—while fact-checkers discern truth from falsehood, who is there to check them? Furthermore, the harm of misuse of AI is already manifested in this arena. For instance, creators of falsehoods may optimize for their objectives using approaches steered by algorithms. Finally, maintaining a high bar of ethics in research itself, particularly ensuring the reproducibility of research results, is vital to the health of the enterprise.

The success of tackling misinformation lies not only in methodology and technology but also education. To help cultivate a society that is more robust to falsehoods, to break “filter bubbles” and “echo chambers”, we must raise the awareness of all aspects about misinformation and we must train a generation of Web users that are well versed in media literacy, data literacy, and logic and fallacy.


Accepted Papers
  • Examining the Roles of Automation, Crowds and Professionals Towards Sustainable Fact-checking

Naeemul Hassan (University of Mississippi), Mohammad Yousuf (University of Oklahoma), Md Mahfuzul Haque (University of Mississippi), Javier A. Suarez Rivas (University of Mississippi), Md Khadimul Islam (The University of Mississippi)

  • Red Bots Do It Better: Comparative Analysis of Social Bot Partisan Behavior

Luca Luceri (University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland, and University of Bern), Ashok Deb (University of Southern California), Adam Badawy (University of Southern California), Emilio Ferrara (University of Southern California)

  • Neural Check-Worthiness Ranking with Weak Supervision: Finding Sentences for Fact-Checking

Casper Hansen (University of Copenhagen), Christian Hansen (University of Copenhagen), Stephen Alstrup (University of Copenhagen), Jakob Grue Simonsen (University of Copenhagen), Christina Lioma (University of Copenhagen)

  • A Linked Data Model for Facts, Statements and Beliefs

Ludivine Duroyon (France Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA), François Goasdoué (France Univ Rennes, Inria, CNRS, IRISA), Ioana Manolescu (France Inria and LIX (UMR 7161, CNRS and Ecole Polytechnique))

  • A Study of Misinformation in WhatsApp groups with a focus on the Brazilian Presidential Elections

Caio Machado (University of Oxford), Beatriz Kira (University of São Paulo), Vidya Narayanan (University of Oxford), Bence Kollanyi (University of Oxford), Philip Howard (University of Oxford)

  • A Topic-Agnostic Approach to Identify Fake News Pages

Sonia Castelo Quispe (New York University), Thais Almeida (Federal University of Amazonas), Anas Elghafari (New York University), Aécio Santos (New York University), Kien Pham (New York University), Eduardo Nakamura (Federal University of Amazonas), Juliana Freire (New York University)

  • Institutional Counter-disinformation Strategies in a Networked Democracy

Jonathan Stray (Columbia University)

  • Differences in Health News from Reliable and Unreliable Media

Sameer Dhoju (The University of Mississippi), Md Main Uddin Rony (The University of Mississippi), Muhammad Ashad Kabir (Charles Sturt University), Naeemul Hassan (The University of Mississippi)

  • Misinfosec: Applying Information Security Paradigms to Misinformation Campaigns

Christopher R. Walker (Marvelous AI, San Francisco, CA), Sara-Jayne Terp (SOFWERX, Tampa, FL), Pablo C. Breuer (U.S. Special Operations Command), Courtney Crooks (Georgia Tech Research Institute)

Invited Posters (all accepted papers + the following)

  • When Algorithms Assign Fact-Checks to Online Stories and News Publishers: A Sociotechnical Perspective

Emma Lurie (Wellesley College), Eni Mustafaraj (Wellesley College)

  • Online Misinformation: From the Deceiver to the Victim

Francesca Spezzano (Boise State University), Anu Shrestha (Boise State University)

  • Building Consequential Rankings

Behzad Tabibianf (MPI-IS & MPI-SWS), Vicenç Gomez (Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Abir De (MPI-SWS), Bernhard Schölkopf (MPI-IS), Manuel Gomez Rodriguez (MPI-SWS)

May 14, 2019, San Francisco, CA, USACo-located with The Web Conference 2019

 International Workshop on Misinformation, Computational Fact-Checking and Credible Web

OPENEDU: #IJF19 The impact of disinformation on human rights #crowdsearcher


The impact of disinformation on human rights

The Internet, and in particular, social media, increasingly impact how people’s worldviews are shaped. In this panel, human rights and digital rights experts will address, in an engaging interview style panel, the impact of disinformation on human rights on freedom of expression but also on refugees rights (e.g., identify, security and freedom), platform accountability and the role of the media. Experts will also discuss how measures to foster the accountability and responsibility of platforms in the struggle against disinformation must not undermine data protection, privacy and freedom of expression, and must respect the right to anonymity. The speakers will present global examples of governments introducing measures which allegedly try to tackle online disinformation when in fact the objective is to suppress dissent, monitor and control the digital space. Speakers will also address the need for honest and positive communications efforts by the media and by political groups that promote civil discourse.

Organised in association with Access Now.

OPENEDU: #IJF19 Let’s save our children from misinformation and misleading content #crowdsearcher


Let’s save our children from misinformation and misleading content

Let’s save our children from misinformation and misleading content.

How might we reshape media literacy – using visual tools, VR, AR, Voice Assistants – to interact with new generations, keep them safe and make them well-informed citizens

The news ecosystem is getting older and older. Adult people produce, consume and share content using platforms, tools and formats made by adults for adults. But what about children and teens?

This session will investigate ideas to fill the gap between the media and the so-called “Minecraft generation”. Journalists should explore new workflows, formats, types of content and platforms. At the same time, we need to interact with educators to define methods and frames to give to young people the right approach to news and media.

Not so long ago, every school or classroom had its own school magazine, where young “wannabe” journalists took their first steps as reporters and editors. Often, real journalists came to school, teaching students how to gather, verify, write news; and how to edit and realize a print issue. But we were also educated to read and consume news as well. Young generations got familiar with newspapers long before becoming newspaper readers.

Now, our children are the first fully mobile digital born generation and the way they interact with media is completely different from our state of mind. When they turn on the television, they expect to watch only on demand content, whenever they want. When they interact with a screen, the only ux they know is “touch”. They get used to creating content – to build a house in the Minecraft world, to record a tutorial on YouTube, to create a music videoclip on TikTok – and share it with their community.

As soon as they grow up, they’ll get in touch with the traditional news ecosystem, even if “digital”, “mobile”, “interactive”. And they’ll face the risks of misinformation, being unable to recognize quality, verified and worth trusting content. Although there are many studies about children’s approach to media and news, the question isn’t only how they consume and react to existing formats and content when they impact with them, or how educators can manage those kinds of tasks, but how we – as content producers and distributors – can reshape the news ecosystem to fit the younger generation’s attitudes, habits and approach. We need to find resources dedicated to creating different types of content and products, exploring the opportunities of emerging technologies, in particular virtual and augmented reality and voice user interfaces.

We should start to think of our children as the next generation of readers, and the next generation of journalists as well.

OPENEDU: #IJF19 Preparing for the next wave: video fake news #crowdsearcher


Preparing for the next wave: video fake news

A startlingly realistic new breed of AI-driven faked videos is starting to emerge, circulated by propagandists and other shadowy actors via social platforms. These videos appear to show news events, or public figures speaking, and seem to be published by legitimate news outlets. However, they are in fact highly sophisticated AI-driven video forgeries. This session explores what strategies and technologies news outlets and consumers should be adopting to defend themselves against this frightening new development.

Organised in association with Reuters.

Translate »